61.86% lower runner time
Three identical required CI checks: BuildBuddy 55.71s → Varion 21.25s.
BuildBuddy ran all three checks; Varion retained one verified primary plus two status-preserving proxies.Run your own CI savings analysis, then inspect direct measured competitor evidence. Varion shows the wins, the smaller advantages, and the cases where a competitor wins.
Measured September 3, 2026. Scenario-specific results, not a universal 50% claim.
Three identical required CI checks: BuildBuddy 55.71s → Varion 21.25s.
BuildBuddy ran all three checks; Varion retained one verified primary plus two status-preserving proxies.Same-VPS self-hosted cache test: BuildBuddy 27.43s → Varion 16.75s.
Both warm runs had 82/82 cache hits. BuildBuddy used its official self-hosted image.Single warm Cloud RBE/cache job: BuildBuddy 18.17s vs Varion 19.23s.
Shown intentionally so the comparison page does not hide competitor wins.Detected current cost $96.55/mo; cheapest GCP recommendation $193.03/mo.
RunRight measured 88.2% p95 CPU and ~7.92 GiB p95 memory, so keeping the current runner was the rational result.Paste or upload the configuration below. The public tester analyzes configuration as data and shows current cost, Varion savings, competitor-method context and the exact candidate rewrite.
Every action includes the detected evidence and whether verification is still required.
Generated changes remain candidates until shadow verification passes.
No automatic rewrite was generated for this pipeline.
| Method | Evidence type | Projected cost | Projected saving |
|---|
A broad “60% more savings” superiority claim remains locked until a sufficiently broad set of direct measured competitor runs meets the verification gate with equivalent required outputs.